Biotech Articles
Publish Your Research Online
Get Recognition - International Audience

Request for an Author Account   |   Login   |   Submit Article
 
 
HOME FAQ TOP AUTHORS FORUMS PUBLISH ARTICLE
 
 

Low DNA Damage Repair Capacity of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

BY: Hareepriyaw M | Category: Bioinformatics | Submitted: 2013-12-19 23:08:36
       Author Photo
Article Summary: "Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are considered pluripotent and are capable to give rise to all types of somatic cells. This ability of ESCs can be utilized in treating certain diseases. ESC like pluripotent stem cells were created successfully in a research work published in 2006 and they were termed as induced pluripotent stem cell.."


Share with Facebook Share with Linkedin Share with Twitter Share with Pinterest Email this article
     


Introduction

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are considered pluripotent and are capable to give rise to all types of somatic cells. This ability of ESCs can be utilized in treating certain diseases. ESC like pluripotent stem cells were created successfully in a research work published in 2006 and they were termed as induced pluripotent stem cells or iPSCs. The iPSCs were possible when four transcription factors called Oct4, c-Myc, Sox2 and Klf4 were introduced into somatic cells of mice. The newly created iPSCs were same as ESCs in their gene expression, morphology, In Vitro differentiation capacity and in epigenetic status. Many studies say that iPSCs are not beneficial clinically due to their genomic instability.

The research work done recently reveals that iPSCs consist of chromosomal anomalies like duplications in chromosome 12 of human iPSCs. The reprogramming of iPSCs is always considered incomplete. The epigenetic and transcriptional properties of these cells are affected by donor cells. The lack of p53 was found to be useful for enhancing the chances of DNA damage, reprogramming, and genomic instability. Therefore, there are higher chances for genomic abnormalities to be present in the iPSCs. Hence, it is necessary to concentrate more on the iPSC genomic status prior to their usage in clinical treatments.

To study the specific reason for genomic instability, DNA damage was introduced into iPSCs through ionizing radiation (IR) and the difference in the ability of iPSCs in DNA damage repair compared to that of mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEF) was observed. This paper discusses various tests and test results associated with iPSCs DNA damage repair capacity from various studies.

Results of the studies

Low DNA damage repair ability of irradiated iPSCs


To test the hypothesis that genomic instability of iPSCs was due to their low DNA damage repair capability, the iPSC cell line 3FB4-1 was selected. The cell line 3FB4-1 was derived from somatic MEF cells of mice and they were irradiated to generate double strand DNA breaks. The dsDNA breaks can result in apoptosis, genome abnormalities and senescence.

Through immunoblotting analysis, it is found that ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated or ATM which is vital in triggering the DNA repair was autophosphorylated and activated due to irradiation. The histone variant gamma-H2AX is a DSB marker which alters its levels in 3FB4-1 and MEF cells. The slight increase in gamma-H2AX focus number of 3FB4-1 cell line than that of MEF cells gives an evidence for low DNA damage repair capacity of iPSC cells.

Whole genome sequencing

Single nucleotide variation analysis and genome DNA sequencing was performed for MEF cells and 3FB4-1 cells, both prior to irradiation and after irradiation. Gelatin resuspension method was used for collecting 3FB4-1 cells. The DNA length in each of the four samples was greater than 64 Gb. Mutations in each of the samples were identified.

iPSCs recorded more point mutations

The single nucleotide variation (SNV) analysis could reveal the presence of point mutations in iPSCs. Samtools Sequence Map Tool and Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool were utilized for scanning the mouse reference genome. Every sample was detected with nearly 2.9 to 4.2 X 106 SNVs. The variation in the sequences of 3FB4-1 (IR+) and 3FB4-1 (IR-) cells were directly compared with that of MEF (IR+) and MEF (IR-) cells. Nearly 9,08,296 SNVs were present in 3FB4-1 cells after ionized radiation and 1,83,518 SNVs were present in MEF cells.

The mutation number in 3FB4-1 cells increased considerably after irradiation from 4,94,616 to 9,36,728. The mutation number in MEF cells increased from 1,243,249 to 1,312,621. When observed individually, 3FB4-1 cells had 3,02,226 single nucleotide variations that were common for IR+ and IR- cells. But, 6,34,502 SNVs were identified from 3FB4-1 cells with IR. In MEF cells (IR+), 3,27,625 SNVs were recovered while 9,84,996 SNVs were recovered commonly from IR+ and IR- MEF cells. From this data, it can be understood that more number of SNVs were observed in irradiated 3FB4-1 cells than in irradiated MEF cells.

The increase in the number of point mutations was noticeable in each chromosome of irradiated 3FB4-1 cells while nearly 3 to 6 percent increase was observed in irradiated MEF cells.

Point mutations in known regions of the genome

The functional importance of these point mutations was investigated in both of the irradiated cells. The results of the experiments revealed that many of these point mutations were present in the introns as well as in intergenic regions. Some of them were present in the untranslated regions of 5' and 3' ends as well as in the sites of splicing. After irradiation, MEF cells and 3FB4-1 cells were observed to possess 949 and 2256 identical point mutations respectively. Number of non- identical point mutations that were observed in irradiated 3FB4-1 and MEF cells were 1454 and 724 respectively.

The noteworthy changes observed in 3FB4-1 (IR+) cells comply with the findings of several studies that iPSCs have lower DNA damage repair capacity and these cells are observed to be more sensitive to any damage to the DNA.

Reference:

Minjie Zhang, Caiyun Yang, Huixian Liu, Yingli Sun. Induced pluripotent stem cells are sensitive to DNA damage. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 11 (2013), 320-326.

About Author / Additional Info:


Search this site & forums
Share this article with friends:



Share with Facebook Share with Linkedin Share with Twitter Share with Pinterest Email this article

More Social Bookmarks (Digg etc..)


Comments on this article: (0 comments so far)

Comment By Comment

Leave a Comment   |   Article Views: 1960



Additional Articles:

•   Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) : It's Application in Hair Transplant Surgery

•   Giant African Snail - A Pest Now Getting Out of Control

•   Methods of Determining Transcription Start Site

•   Celiac Disease: New Advancements in Detection and Therapy




Latest Articles in "Bioinformatics" category:
•   Career as Bioinformatician and Biostatistician

•   Expander: A Tool of Bioinformatics

•   Role of Bioinformatics in Drug Discovery

•   Importance and Applications of Bioinformatics in Molecular Medicine

•   Bioinformaticist vs. Bioinformatician - Definition, Differences and Career Outlook

•   Bioinformatics Application in Nanotechnology

•   How Bioinformatics Handles the Biological Data?

•   Application of Bioinformatics in Medicine

•   Prenatal Diagnosis via Bioinformatics Skills

•   Applications of Bioinformatics in Agriculture

•   Next Generation Sequencing Technologies: 454 Pyrosequencing

•   GenScan: Bioinformatics Software For Structure Prediction and Analysis of Gene

•   Pairwise Sequence Alignment For Sequence Similarity

•   Applications of Bioinformatics in Biotechnology

•   Introduction to Bioinformatics: Role of Mathematics and Technology

•   Why and How of Normalization in Microarray Data Analysis

•   Steps in Microarray Data Analysis - Part I

•   Steps in Microarray Data Analysis - Part II

•   Bilirubin Metabolism And its Role in Neonatal Jaundice



Important Disclaimer: All articles on this website are for general information only and is not a professional or experts advice. We do not own any responsibility for correctness or authenticity of the information presented in this article, or any loss or injury resulting from it. We do not endorse these articles, we are neither affiliated with the authors of these articles nor responsible for their content. Please see our disclaimer section for complete terms.
Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
Copyright © 2010 biotecharticles.com - Do not copy articles from this website.

ARTICLE CATEGORIES :
Agriculture Bioinformatics Applications Biotech Products Biotech Research
Biology Careers College/Edu DNA Environmental Biotech
Genetics Healthcare Industry News Issues Nanotechnology
Others Stem Cells Press Release Toxicology  


  |   Disclaimer/Privacy/TOS   |   Submission Guidelines   |   Contact Us